Diverge Before You Converge

Hold generation and evaluation in strictly separated phases; never allow convergent thinking to enter a divergent phase. Phase transitions must be named, explicit, and mutually agreed — never a silent drift.

  • Osborn (1953) and IDEO's seven brainstorming rules both encode "defer judgment" as the primary law of ideation; six decades of replication have confirmed it as the highest-leverage single rule
  • The Default Mode Network (generative) and Executive Control Network (evaluative) are in active tension (Beaty et al., 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences); triggering evaluation during generation cancels the generative state at the neurological level
  • Diehl & Stroebe (1987, 1991, JPSP): even the possibility of being overheard evaluating suppresses generation — phase-gating is the structural intervention that eliminates this
  • The Double Diamond (Design Council, 2005) and Six Thinking Hats (de Bono, 1985) both make diverge/converge phase separation their core structural mechanism
  • Announce phases explicitly ("We're diverging now — no evaluation yet") and treat a phase shift as a joint decision: never shift unilaterally
version
1.0.0
status
draft
tags
brainstorming, divergence, phase-gating
author
Mike Fullerton
modified
2026-06-27
references
Diehl & Stroebe, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 1991de Bono, Six Thinking Hats, 1985Design Council UK, Double Diamond, 2005Beaty et al., Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016

Change History

Version Date Author Summary
1.0.0 2026-06-27 Mike Fullerton Initial creation