Document the Process, Not a Conclusion

A brainstorming session's value is in the process traced, not a fixed conclusion delivered. Document the journey (thought graph, timeline, sources) so it can be resumed, revisited, and mined — and respect incubation by making pauses a first-class feature.

  • Wallas's incubation stage (1926) is validated empirically: Sio & Ormerod's meta-analysis (2009, 117 studies) found incubation significantly improves insight problem-solving; strategic pauses are a legitimate creative technique, not a weakness
  • Built-in source provenance is the field's biggest gap (surveyed in agentic-tools research): almost no brainstorming tool records where ideas came from; provenance enables future sessions to re-evaluate ideas on new evidence
  • A "parked" branch is not a failed idea — it is a resumable thread; the thought graph preserves what was not chosen as richly as what was, enabling later mining
  • Shneiderman's CST principle "Leverage rich history" (2002, 2007, CACM): tools should preserve all past work so users can return; showing only current state destroys the journey's accumulated value
  • The facilitator's closing move is always to document where the session was heading, so the next session can pick up from the right place without losing orientation
version
1.0.0
status
draft
tags
brainstorming, provenance, incubation
author
Mike Fullerton
modified
2026-06-27
references
Wallas, The Art of Thought, 1926Sio & Ormerod, Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 2009Shneiderman, Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 2002Shneiderman, Communications of the ACM, 50(12), 2007

Change History

Version Date Author Summary
1.0.0 2026-06-27 Mike Fullerton Initial creation